Help Wanted
The Big Here

Population of watershed

13) How many people live in your watershed?

Posted on May 9, 2003 at 6:47 PM

Comments

The whole population of Montana is less than that of a moderately sized city. By the way.

I think the estimate was around 80,000 without college students.

All of the towns around the place I grew up probably add to 15,000 people.

Posted by Destini on January 5, 2007 at 11:35 PM

the most closest smallest watershed about 10000

Posted by Anita schneider on October 23, 2006 at 3:18 PM

I live 30 east of the continental divide in Colorado. I see the snow fall above me. I drink it when it melts. It flows from me toward the Mississippi and the Atlantic. My watershed is shared by everyone east of the divide in the Rockies, parts of southern Canada and all of the midwest and eastern US that drains to the Mississippi, no? Maybe 100-150 million people. I try to be nice to the people downstream.

Posted by Rusty Brockmann on September 19, 2006 at 4:35 AM

Pushing 3 million residents. Although many more are here on any given day. There are Many hotel rooms in Las Vegas.

Posted by Chris on August 17, 2006 at 4:28 AM

Approximately 15 million on the San Francisco Bay, San Joaquin and Sacramento river watershed. I can only guess since population information I use in my work is linked to government jurisdictions not watershed boundaries.

Posted by Christopher Swan on July 20, 2006 at 3:49 PM

1,5 milion persons

Posted by gabrielsilva on July 18, 2006 at 5:31 PM

I have water rights on the prickly pear creek, along with approximately 750 other people. The prickly pear creek is a tributary of the Missouri River, and the Missouri River flows through many states. I would estimate the entire watershed of the Missouri River includes in excess of 1,000,000 people.

Posted by Lynne on July 13, 2006 at 12:07 AM

Well, everyone in the Helena Valley--about 45,000. We are surrounded by mountains that create boundaries for the water courses. Check the maps and books at the local library.

Posted by Bobbie on July 12, 2006 at 11:52 PM

About 500,000.

It was half that 25 years ago.

I know the population because it's in the newspaper from time to time.

Posted by Jane on February 18, 2006 at 9:36 PM

I bet this map (population per watershed) must exist somewhere.

Posted by Kevin Kelly on October 3, 2005 at 6:18 PM


This is another "depends" question. The valley drained
by the stream that drains my house lot is about 15,000
but the Charles River watershed is more like 3 million.

Posted by John on September 21, 2005 at 6:57 PM

If you mean the immediate watershed, two people.

If you mean to the river, probalby 40,000 or more.

If you mean to the ocean, or at least the Gulf of Mexico, probably 1.5 million.

Method: go to the library and look at an atlas of economic districts.
Pick up census data from the net and collate with topozone.

Posted by John S. Quarterman on September 18, 2005 at 5:05 AM

Which watershed? We've changed the natural one with dams and canals.

Though, if we look at the entire central valley, which is the bigger watershed, even with just natural routes, the population has to be in the millions.

Posted by path on September 15, 2005 at 2:31 AM

1. wikipedia
2. Local council offices
3. Guesstimate

Posted by Cath Perry on September 13, 2005 at 11:48 AM

Roughly 250k. Half a mil if you expand it based on DEP measurements of our watershed. I consider where our water supply originates directly as our watershed, although I readily admit the greater watershed of north Jersey is much larger and affects 5 million of NJ's eight million people.

Posted by Christopher Wanko on September 12, 2005 at 8:11 PM

500,000

Posted by kevin on September 12, 2005 at 6:34 PM


Post a Comment










Remember personal info?