I found a video of the “Leave Me Alone Box” that, like these machines, turns itself off.
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-04-24-n59.html
Posted by Scott on April 25, 2008 at 2:44 PMivan illich wrote about the ultimate machine (the plastic toy version) in ‘deschooling society’
Posted by james pierce on April 6, 2008 at 8:01 AMI have a memory of a friend (and floormate of Shannon’s at Bell Labs)who told me that Shannon had a similar sort of machine on his office door (?) that would whimsically change his “in” to “out” and vice versa for whether the great man was there or not. (Memory serves perhaps a little faulty here, but I have a very strong memory-sense of Joe Heller’s Major Major from Catch-22 regarding this In/Out sign.)
Posted by John Ptak on April 3, 2008 at 8:32 PMHere is a youtube video of the Coffin Bank: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9shV8GQEF34
I like how the mechanism keeps trying until it succeeds.
Posted by Peter on March 13, 2008 at 9:47 AMThanks Ward. I posted your suggested link to the video. Very cool.
Posted by Kevin Kelly on March 10, 2008 at 12:25 PMThere is a link to a very short video on the bottom of the Wikipedia page about Claude Shannon. It is referenced as the “Most Beautiful Machine”.
This is the direct link: http://www.kugelbahn.ch/sesam_e.htm
Posted by Ward on March 10, 2008 at 2:19 AMSomething very similar comes to mind, but I remember it as a money box that would whirr and clank and then shoot out a ghostly/skeletal hand to take your coin and then shut off.
Posted by michael on March 10, 2008 at 1:50 AMYes, there was a toy version - like “the thing” of the Adam’s Family. I bought one 24 years ago at Ripley’s Believe it or Not in San Francisco. It was a black box with a lever on top. A hand came out and pushed the lever “off” and then quickly retreated back into the box. There was a bank version as well, on which you could place a coin and the hand would come out and grab it and take it into the box.
Posted by Michael Wesch on March 9, 2008 at 11:19 AMI can confirm that the toy did exist. My only memory of it is trying it out in on a store shelf, probably some time in the mid to late 60s, so I’m sure the things were commercially produced — as soon as I started reading this post I remembered the one I’d seen.
Posted by Joseph Holmes on March 8, 2008 at 5:13 AMThis idea was a toy that, as I recall, was advertised in the back of comic-books. I guess now I know where they got the idea.
Maybe these people (or an earlier incarnation) sold it. Was it a bank? I seem to remember a brown box and a yellow arm. http://www.johnsonsmith.com/
Posted by TJ on March 7, 2008 at 10:13 PMI used to have one of those toys. It must have been about 1960-62. The box was black. The hand was ghoulish green.
Posted by John Coate on March 7, 2008 at 8:28 PMThere are a few more pics and a little animation of the human/machine hands in on/off action here:
http://www.kugelbahn.ch/sesam_e.htm
Posted by Gareth Branwyn on March 7, 2008 at 4:49 PMI like this concept and found the Ultimate Machine fascinating, but I’m not sure I get how it “does nothing”. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but it does a lot of things. It seems quite complex in the way that it produces sound, has mechanical triggers to open/close a box lid, has a mounted arm that is (I presume) operated by levers or pulleys, and so on ad infinitum. How could one rightly say that it does nothing? That’s a lot of operations working in harmony.
I think that the gripping psychological effect of the machine comes from the disappointment of observing the technical beauty of all these synchronized parts ultimately achieving no significant purpose. None. True, not many machines are built so elaborately for the single purpose of returning to state zero without doing something, however small, that is of worth to the universe. In that sense, the machine actually is pretty sinister.
Of course, we could all take off our geek engineer hats, and recognize this machine for what it really is: art. This Ultimate Machine certainly makes you think, and that’s surely worth something to the universe…right?
Posted by Odbasta on March 7, 2008 at 2:51 PMYou jogged my aging memory Kevin. There was a plastic, toy version of this in this back in the first half of the 60’s. This was all I could find so far. But I plan on finding one of these for my collection.
Posted by Gary Hart on March 7, 2008 at 1:52 PMReminds me of something you’d see on LOST.
Posted by J Johnston on March 7, 2008 at 12:40 PMType the characters you see in the picture above.


A Ultimate machine is shown in the first part of Gene Searchinger’s “The Human Language Series” (PBS). It is a small wood box (I guess it is about 20 cm high x 30 x 40 - estimated from the hand size shown in the video). It fits James Crow description (above) better than the case shown at the beginning of this page (and it much nicier too…)
Posted by André Eliseu on April 28, 2008 at 9:09 AM